CASE STUDY
The $4M Agency That Didn't Know Which Clients Made Money
$4M, 30-Person Marketing Agency
GROSS MARGIN
50%
60%
10 POINT IMPROVEMENT
ADDED VALUE
~$400K
PER YEAR FOUND
AT A GLANCE
COMPANY
Marketing Agency
SIZE
$4M Annual Revenue
30 Team Members
INDUSTRY
Marketing & Advertising
ENGAGEMENT
90-Day FICS Install
FOCUS AREAS
Customer Profitability, Workforce Utilization, Forecasting, Growth
The Problem
Revenue was solid. But at the client level, the picture was invisible — no view of which customers were actually profitable, where the team's hours really went, or what growth would do to cash and capacity.
​
The forecast, to the extent one existed, wasn't connected to how the agency actually grew. Total P&L: fine. Client-level truth: missing.
The Install — A Phased 90-Day Build
Think CFO installed FICS in phases — each layer live and delivering before the next went in:
-
Rolling forecast (day 60) — forward revenue and staffing visibility, live and trusted inside two months
-
Customer-level profitability and workforce efficiency reports (day 90) — revenue vs. true delivery cost per client, and where the hours went vs. where the margin lived
-
Lead tracking and conversion-to-new-business modeling (day 90) — leads × conversion % feeding acquisition, churn modeled explicitly, both flowing into the rolling forecast's revenue and staffing projections
The Results
-
Gross margin: 50% → 60% — ten points, worth roughly $400K annually at $4M revenue — driven by repricing and restructuring around customer profitability and redeploying under-utilized capacity
-
A forecast that updates with the business — acquisition and churn grounded in actual lead flow and conversion %, not spreadsheet extrapolation
-
Staffing and hiring decisions made against projected capacity needs, not gut feel
OWNER QUOTE
“We always knew our total numbers. What we didn't know was which clients were actually worth keeping. Now we do — and the margin proves it.”